From the community editorial board: BVSD reminder

0

Nine people wish to dismiss three members of the BVSD board of directors. Your opinion ?


To help you with this recall question, I spoke to my Great Aunt Lucille, a wonderful woman whose age is close to three digits and who always enjoys a frozen martini while she honors us with her opinions. Here are Aunt Lucille’s thoughts on the reasons for the petitioners’ recall:

1. Ignore dissenting opinions before making important decisions that impact staff and students.

Lucille: Looks like they’re just crazy that they didn’t get what they want.

2. Did not provide meaningful oversight of unelected health officials who presented misleading and false information.

Lucille: Their job is to oversee the schools, not the health department.

3. Accepted the advice of the aforementioned officials while ignoring the professional, accredited and knowledgeable voters.

Lucille: Of course, let’s fire the doctors and have a Facebook user operated on who has done his research.

4. A cruel disregard for the physical and mental health of students by making masks compulsory indefinitely and without a solid foundation in science for all students from the age of 2 years.

Lucille: Okay, that’s just stupid. Children love masks. And hats. And disguises.

5. Endangering the health of students by refusing to recognize legitimate medical exemptions approved by health professionals.

Lucille: Which health professionals – the pillow guy? My money is on the pros at County Health.

6. Promotion of unauthorized COVID vaccines with emergency use authorization for students, despite the controversial risk / benefit ratio for children.

Lucille: Emergency use isn’t nothing, like we used to say somewhere about something – Anyway, isn’t that approved now? And it’s better than horse dewormer!

7. Neglected to respond to student health and safety grievances raised by constituents throughout the district.

Lucille: Grievance, Schmievance. I always say that they are angry because they did not succeed.

8. Avoided liability by excluding parents from in-person attendance at school board meetings.

Lucille: Ha! They can still stand on a soap box in the comfort of their living room!

Fern O’Brien, [email protected]


Can’t we at least agree that SARS-CoV-2 is real, and causes human illness and death to an unacceptable level? Can’t we at least agree that respecting the health of others, respecting science, and making small sacrifices for the good of self, family and community is at least commendable, if not necessary?

This foolish attempt to recall school board members shows – once again – that we cannot.

I have to admit, I find it impressive the mental gyrations that twist the established facts into a scathing conspiracy theory “proving” that board members are in fact AGAINST health and safety. “Impressed” not by the reasoning, but by the fact that evolution has made the human brain so complex but also sometimes so stupid.

To be fair, a lot of smart people are incredibly stupid, even though they think their ignorance equals the knowledge and experience of others. The Trump years have revealed how shocking these kinds of people are. But what amazes me the most is how so-called rational creatures can stupidly choose against well-being (theirs and that of others).

As a scientist, I have to ask myself if stupidity offers some kind of evolutionary advantage. It may be that stupidity could be useful in trying something that the more intelligent members of the species would recoil against. The first time a human said “Hey, look at that snotty mass inside that oyster shell: I bet it’s delicious,” for example. As opposed to, say, in a viral pandemic where someone insists that a good gargle with Betadine or a drop of horse dewormer is more beneficial than a preventative vaccine.

It turns out that there is a whole literature on stupidity in evolution, which would take a lot more room to summarize than what the camera offers. Basically, as with all human traits, there is a specter of stupidity. It doesn’t matter in most cases, but it’s downright dangerous in others. Like when there is a creeping virus that pushes the stupid towards elimination, dragging others with them into oblivion. Even their own children.

You’d think we could at least agree that it’s really, really stupid.

Fintan Steele, [email protected]


I do not support the effort to recall BVSD board members. I strongly disagree with the reasoning and logic of the initiative. I support the mandate of the mask. My children are too young to be vaccinated and my priority is to keep them in school five days a week. I would also support a COVID vaccine mandate for students and teachers. Vaccines save lives, public schools are already requiring more vaccinations for children to enroll, and it is imperative to stem the spread of COVID-19 and its variants.

That said, this recall effort amplifies the mistrust and dissatisfaction with BVSD and Superintendent Rob Anderson that many in our community – not just anti-maskers and anti-vaxxers – feel. Since the start of the pandemic, the BVSD board and administration have congratulated themselves and opposed criticism. I experienced this firsthand as a frank parent of elementary school children. My demands last year for the district to improve communication (Let’sTalkBVSD seemed designed to appease parents without actually involving them), to reinstate a five-day school week for the spring semester of 2021, and to temper patronizing responses from the district on social media were rejected. . I have often heard from parents who also felt rejected or ignored. Even BVSD board candidate Nicole Rajpal, acting as vice chair of the district accountability committee, warned Dr Anderson in February in a publicly accessible email: “There is mistrust. growing towards the district and council and a lack of hope for improvement over the months like [sic] years to come.

I expect the current recall effort to fail because most Boulder residents believe in the safety of vaccines, the effectiveness of masks, and the importance of sustaining in-person learning. But the initiative underlines the existing frustration and should motivate the BVSD board and administration to improve communication, trust and transparency. Otherwise, the next disgruntled group might present a more persuasive and less controversial argument than supporters of today’s recall.

Rachel Walker, [email protected]


One of the people requesting a callback, Kirsten Leslie, said in an interview with the Daily Camera published on September 15, “If a parent thinks that not wearing a mask at school is the safest and best thing for their child, they should have the right to do so, ”she said. noted.

According to the petitioner’s logic, if a parent chooses to let their child poop in a bucket in the corner of the classroom, it is a parental choice that must be respected. If a parent determines that it is “safer and better” for my child to run around the room every five minutes, that should be respected. Does your child need a bloodcurdling scream whenever they are confused or frustrated? By all means, parental choice must prevail. This argument is so obviously ridiculous, stupid and selfish that I am virtually speechless.

Another petitioner, Michael Gaeta, added: “It is not ethical to override parental choice with these decisions”. What a sad day when our school board has to spend a lot of time and potentially a huge amount of money defending the very concept of public health. A public health order is currently mandated by Boulder Public Health for the masks, and the vaccines have been approved by the FDA for general use. The school board did not make these decisions, so at best the petitioners’ complaint is directed to the wrong government agency. In addition, it is highly ethical to override parental choice in determining what will be best for the health and safety of all BVSD students. Of course, it is ethical for the school board to consider and reject requests from parents that are inconsistent with maintaining the health and safety of every student and teacher.

If these petitioners were to be held responsible for the financial consequences of a failed recall, would they still have filed their complaint? I doubt. But again, I’m not the one telling my kid to poop around here.

Ted Rockwell, [email protected]


Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.